Search for: "Desist v. United States"
Results 361 - 380
of 527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2012, 4:51 pm
(v) were 32Red's Community marks and United Kingdom trade marks valid;? [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:28 am
§1337 - aka ITC Section 337 - permits the ITC to investigate alleged unfair competition resulting from the importation of goods into the United States where those goods would, among other possible harms - infringe a valid and enforceable US patent. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
., used by a pattern analysis unit to recognize information in a document, such as dates, addresses, phone numbers, etc. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
This position is to be contrasted with other jurisdictions such as the United States which has varying degrees of protection for personality rights and the right of publicity at state level. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
It states that a site is not subject to action under the bill if it “engages in an activity that would not make the operator liable for monetary relief for infringing the copyright under section 512 of title 17, United States Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:34 am
(B) BUSINESS DIRECTED TO RESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:06 pm
Members of the public and proposed respondents may address how issuance of the requested exclusion order and/or a cease and desist order in this investigation could affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States consumers. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:02 pm
So, when I present to the juror that my client and his cancer treatment has went up against 5 Grand Juries which involved the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Aetna Life Insurance, Emprise, Inc., Texas State Medical Board, and the United States Government, and was found not guilty in all 5 cases, you will wish you never wrote your article. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:10 pm
His recent attempt to register “Eat More Kale” with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), however, irked Georgia-based Chick-fil-A, which sent him a cease-and-desist letter claiming the marks are confusingly similar, according to press accounts. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 10:12 pm
Switch has spent millions of dollars to advertise and promote the SWITCH marks in print, broadcast media and on the internet through the Switch website, accessible throughout the United States and around the world at . . . [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:16 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:39 am
Federal courts accross the United States are split over this question, but in the Western District of New York, the answer is now "no. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
(PatLit) United Kingdom Limitation of damages in the Patents County Court (EPLAW) UKIPO issues TPN (3/2011) – hearings in cases of invalidation on relative grounds (Class 46) United States US General Does 337 apply to foreign trade secret missapropiation? [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
In support of this opposition, eBay cites Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc., 506 F3d 1165 (9th Cir., Nove. 5, 2007) where the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stated that the term "BAY" was the dominant portion of the eBay mark. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a general exclusion order prohibiting the entry into the United States of ink cartridges that infringed any of ten Seiko Epson patents, plus a cease and desist order stopping the sale of infringing ink cartridges already in the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a general exclusion order prohibiting the entry into the United States of ink cartridges that infringed any of ten Seiko Epson patents, plus a cease and desist order stopping the sale of infringing ink cartridges already in the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:34 am
(d/b/a PPC, Inc.) v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am
(IAM) United Kingdom EWHC (Admin) holds defendant’s acquisition of illegally copied audio files would constitute an offence under s. 329 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002: Sitek v Circuit Court of Swidnica (1709 Copyright Blog) IPO – Original Bucks Fizz members lose trade mark battle over name (Out-Law) (IPKat) Should the UK facilitate online filing of registered design applications? [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US General Can I object to the production of my client’s source code on the basis of relevance or confidentiality? [read post]
