Search for: "Doe Defendants A-Z" Results 361 - 380 of 523
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2011, 3:55 am by Marie Louise
(China LawBlog)   Ethiopia A to Z of African official IP websites no.19: Ethiopia (Afro-IP)   Europe OHIM’s new mediation service: in force since 24 October 2011 (Class 46) Child’s-play for CJEU as Spanish pogs pip Pepsi’s: PepsiCo v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic, OHIM (IPKat) General Court finds overall similarity between SEVEN and SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND marks: Case T-176/10 (Class 46) General Court confirmed that Soviet Coat of Arms cannot be registered as a CTM: T… [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:13 am
EMI gave a statement defending its position, saying: "When a song is created based wholly on any of our writers' works, those writers need to grant their permission...If that permission isn't granted, then we ask the service in question to remove the song. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am by Marie Louise
(IPKat)   United States US General US signs ACTA (Ars Technica) KEI comment on US signing of ACTA (KEI) Private federal civil actions for trade secret infringement (Patently-O)   US Patent Reform Big laws, small businesses: what will be the AIA’s impact (IP finance) Sarnoff: Derivation and prior art problems with the new patent act (Patently-O) America Invents Act: How the new law impacts your clients and your patent practice, part 2 (Patent Law Practice Center) Does the… [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:59 am by Bexis
  Plaintiff has also failed to show that [defendant’s] obligations under Canadian law are relevant here. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am by Marie Louise
(IP Dragon) Taiwanese patent fund changes tack and shifts focus to blocking competitors in China (IAM) Does drinking GI protected Oolong tea help the local farmers? [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am by Marie Louise
Nike USA, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois will not import limitations from the specification: Morningware v Hearthware Home Products (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court S D Carolina: Plaintiff’s purchase of accused product in forum state does not support exercise of personal jurisdiction over defendant: Van Romer et al v Argonaut Inflatable Research and Engineering (Docket Report)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cross… [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking requires particular allegations that each defendant marked: Newt LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking requires particular allegations that each defendant marked: Newt LLC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm by Marie Louise
(IP Spotlight) (IPBiz) CAFC: Does a patent license include related patents? [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:17 pm by Franita Tolson
  So the question is how does an incumbent defend against something that is virtually unprovable? [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 2:48 am by Eric S. Solotoff
 Does this mean that you cannot use a private investigator, as is often done to prove cohabitation? [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:00 am by Ken Lammers
Since time immemorial, people have given defendants bad legal advice. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:01 am by Jeff Gamso
Does he look the defendant in the eye or turn away? [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm by Mandelman
  This Court does not accept the argument that because MERS may be involved with 50% of all residential mortgages in the country, that is reason enough for this Court to turn a blind eye to the fact that this process does not comply with the law. [read post]