Search for: "Doe I " Results 361 - 380 of 259,470
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2024, 9:19 am by Eric Goldman
But this does not mean that Meta can, from that face, identify a person. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 7:57 am by Monica Scherer
  Talaq is a principle of Islamic law, adopted as the secular law of Pakistan, giving a husband the ability to divorce his wife by stating “I divorce thee” three times. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 7:50 am by Evan George
   As we’ve discussed, the Hawaiʻi constitution does protect environmental rights, but not as part of the state Bill of Rights. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 7:02 am
 Pix credit here  I am posting and providing brief reflections on the essays that make up the excellent new online symposium organized by the marvelous Caroline Omari Lichuma and Lucas Roorda and appearing on the blog site of the Business and Human Rights Law Journal. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Jordan Furlong
But nor do I think any such studies would be especially useful. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
It really does have the potential to improve lives in a tangible way. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
In a new paper, I discuss whether mandatory central clearing of single-name credit default swaps (CDS) should be adopted in the United States and Europe — an issue with important consequences for financial stability in both regions. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:04 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting decision; I'm not an expert on the field, so I can't speak to how it fits with other precedents in this area, but I thought it was worth passing along. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 9:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
And, trademark-specific question, does that mean that trademark infringement claims are also not worrisome, or does the difference between denying the benefits of registration and the full suppression/punishment of infringement (and sign ordinances) matter? [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 9:34 am by Rick Hasen
I have been arguing that it does not violate the First Amendment to make it a crime to intentionally lie about when, where or how people vote. [read post]