Search for: "Doe v. Delaware" Results 361 - 380 of 3,815
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm by Edward T. Kang
In response to appeals from the U.S. trustee, and the states of California, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia, the court held that the Bankruptcy Code does not authorize the plan’s nonconsensual release of third-party nondebtors, like the Sacklers, thus leaving the states’ authority to file further actions against the Sacklers intact. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by John C. Coffee, Jr.
Citing the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Osborn v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:37 am
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TWITTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 10:38 pm by Peter Mahler
Therefore, requiring the members to exercise their consent right in good faith does not negate express provisions of the agreements. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
In fact, many state courts already explicitly follow Delaware law when their own state law does not provide an answer to the question at bar.[23] Even foreign countries look to Delaware corporate law for guidance.[24] There is no reason to think they would cease doing so even if a Restatement were available. [read post]