Search for: "Doe v. Smith" Results 361 - 380 of 7,211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
 In the aftermath of Edwards v Cook, a number of patentees have successfully deployed creative arguments to avoid falling foul of an “Edwards v Cook”-style attack. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 1:13 pm by Lisa Baird
Over on the Drug & Device Law blog, Reed Smith partner Jim Beck applauds the recent decision in Tyree v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:38 pm by Jon Sands
Editorial note: This is an Az FPD case.Towery v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 pm by Jane Chong
What happened in the past does not relieve you from your responsibility for the present. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 6:10 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
In the federal judicial realm, the Sixth Court of Appeals in Does v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”Shulman v Hunderfund, 12 NY3d 143In the words of Justice Smith, “In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254 [1964]). [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am by SHG
As noted in the New York Law Journal, the Court of Appeals, by Judge Robert Smith, granted leave in People v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 11:00 am by Eugene Volokh
How close the link has to be is an important and not fully settled question; but the broader doctrine does exist, e.g.: The Court has held, in United States v. [read post]