Search for: "Doe v. Sullivan"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2019, 9:03 am
There are reasons why judges do this.The case is Doe v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 5:51 am
The plaintiff worked for the Village of Monticello in Sullivan County. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 3:40 am
Sullivan's theory about a Moreno effect. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:21 pm
” The postscript to the reported judgment of Seagrove v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 11:19 am
From DOD’s press release: The Department of Defense announced today that the Convening Authority, Office of Military Commissions referred charges to a military commission in the case of United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
To support this decision, the Court pointed to Sullivan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
As U.S. financial institutions assess their ESG risks, opportunities, policies and procedures for 2023, key considerations include the numerous significant ESG developments in 2022—in particular, recent proposals and initiatives announced by financial regulators with respect to climate-related risk management and disclosures—and overarching regulatory, political, investor and litigation trends. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 10:33 am
Ted] Stevens [case], everyone does now, and I've crafted a standing order I'm going to issue," Sullivan said at the hearing. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 4:45 am
Samuel Yasgur, the Sullivan County Attorney, had determined that certain financial disclosure statements of filed by Steven Lungen, the Sullivan County District Attorney, were appropriately redacted prior to Society's inspection of the public records it had sought to review and that it was not entitled to photocopy such documents. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
Citing an earlier Supreme Court ATS case, Sosa v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
Citing an earlier Supreme Court ATS case, Sosa v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 5:41 pm
City of Mesquite, 129 F.3d 831, 832-33 (5th Cir.1997); Sullivan v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 9:28 am
Wash.) in Sullivan v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:24 am
As for government actors, the court imposing civil liability on the protesters counts -- as does the public imposition of legal rules in defining the torts alleged -- NY Times v Sullivan, remember.To which I reply:Yes, and on those facts the Court could properly draw the line and hold that the separation was sufficient to avoid actionable injury. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:26 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kiobel v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:22 pm
Nasser; Matter of Sullivan v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 4:09 pm
The case involved the District Attorney of Sullivan County. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:55 am
" Rice v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:39 am
Sullivan for contributing this post. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 7:02 pm
Sullivan, Esq. [read post]
