Search for: "Does 1-70"
Results 361 - 380
of 5,924
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2011, 4:00 am
The court held:There is nothing in the language of K.A.R. 30-5-70(c)(2) or any of the Kansas Medicaid regulations to indicate that the regulations either were enacted or are enforced in such a way as to target Jehovah's Witnesses. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:44 pm
Price (via OUP website): £70. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:30 pm
Get DBQ Forms Completed for Conditions Already Service Related This has been proven to be the #1 best way for increasing disability rating, but what exactly does it entail? [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:59 pm
That does not mean, however, that the professional limited liability company in dissolution has to divide up the clients. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:41 am
It isn't that I do not think that there is something inherently wrong with a person who hurts another out of hate or prejudice, it is that : 1. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Following on from two other recent contributions on this blog (here and here) about TK, these are this Kat's current concerns.1) There is no definition of TKIf you want to protect something, it is indispensable to define what it is. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 8:56 am
Eighth Circuit: IZM v Roesmount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schs, Independent Sch Dist No 1 70 IDELR 86 (8th Cir 7/14/17) Eighth Circuit ruled that a state statute regarding Braille instruction did not raise the bar for FAPE. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 7:02 am
FINAL UPDATE 1:34 p.m. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 11:09 pm
Would a one-quarter share of $1 million be enough to meet those expectations? [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm
This transition relief applies for plans under which (1) dependent coverage is not offered, (2) dependent coverage that does not constitute minimum essential coverage is offered, or (3) dependent coverage is offered for some, but not all, dependents. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 7:16 am
In applying these criteria to existing EV offerings, the effect does seem to be a winnowing of eligible EVs as evidenced by the U.S. [read post]
21 May 2014, 9:19 pm
Or, what does the obligation to facilitate relief schemes concretely mean? [read post]
Guest Post: Eye witness account of India's first compulsory license appeal before the IPAB [Part II]
8 Mar 2013, 2:47 am
The Board held that since Form 70 does not seem to indicate filing of evidence at the time of filing of Form 70 and in any case the Controller had all the evidence placed before him before he made a decision regarding the grant of a compulsory license. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:50 am
If, for example, the court says that Motorola is entitled to $1 per device, Apple will then tell Motorola that it can, for instance, get 70 cents now or Apple will continue to litigate, since the $1 offer would be a get-out-of-jail card at any stage of the dispute. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:28 am
wait, does that count as Arson? [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 7:33 am
The text of the application as filed within the meaning of the EPC is the Italian text (Article 70(1) EPC).1.1.2 In the application as filed, claim 7 includes the term "spostamenti", which was translated into English as "movements", i.e. the normal translation of this term. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
Thus, the grounds for refusal sub Article 3(1)(b)-(d) do not ensure that a certain sign is generally kept free for use over time.Unlike the absolute grounds for refusal sub Article 3(1)(b)-(d), the absolute ground relating to shapes (Article 3(1)(e) of the Trade Mark Directive) cannot be overcome by acquired distinctiveness [para 79] and, overall, “it overwhelmingly seeks to protect competition” [para 80, referring… [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 4:58 am
The story about the lawsuit says that (1) the widow "is seeking an unspecified amount of damages" and (2) the suit "does not name Boh Bros. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 12:40 am
The fair balance mandate that the CJEU refers to is the “limitation which the parodic exploitation of a third-party work or character is subject to” (limite cui soggiace lo sfruttamento parodistico dell’opera o del personaggio altrui), also considering that the CJEU has repeatedly held that the protection of IP under Article 17(2) of the EU Charter is not absolute.The three-step test is part of the fair balance mandate: the circumstance that a parody is made for profit… [read post]
