Search for: "Does 1-82" Results 361 - 380 of 1,895
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2010, 12:03 pm by Gregory Forman
 There is an $82 increase between $17,000 and $18,000 so the rate of change in the rate of change, which was only $3 when comparing $18,000, $19,000 and $20,000, is $45 when comparing $17,000, $18,000 and $19,000. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 3:28 am by Diane Tweedlie
The invention, illustrated in figure 9B; 916, is to extend the user's access rights, even if he/she has logged out, until the transfer of scanned data to the storage device is complete; see [74],[82] and [84] and the flow-charts in figures 11 and 12; steps S1107, S1201 and S1202.3. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
” (T 41/82 [1])Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.To have a look at the file wrapper, click here.NB: This decision was also reported here. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 8:29 am
LAOT is proud to share a small highlight of the judgment: In paragraph 82, Nick Robinson, one of our contributors, has been cited. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Next week, on 30 November and 1 December 2021, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in ZXC v Bloomberg LP. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
First, the claim does not otherwise specify the structure of the metal components. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:27 am by Jochen Vester (UK)
However, it does not yet reflect the finalisation of the market risk framework published in January 2019. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Donald Thompson
 The Supreme Court in Miller v Pate, 386 US 1, 6-7 (1967) stated:The prosecution deliberately misrepresented the truth. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:54 am
For this reason, Rachum-Twaig concludes that “the right to make derivative works as a legal norm does not match the sociological-philosophical understanding of creativity and should be scrutinized and re-evaluated” (p. 82). [read post]
14 May 2014, 7:47 am
 As pointed out in that post, the scope of the “Bolar” exemption codified in Article 27(k)(l) of the UPC Agreement gives rise to some concerns about how this exemption will be harmonised, since current national laws have implemented “corresponding” exemptions in different ways, and some of these seem incompatible with the Agreement wording.Some countries (such as the UK) use the same “narrow” implementation as used in the UPC, excluding only trials for… [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Guest Contributor
But if the glass is contaminated by something like lead (atomic number 82), it will have a much higher absorption even if the overall density remains similar to standalone glass. [read post]