Search for: "Does I through IX"
Results 361 - 380
of 693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2007, 7:27 am
(c) Content Protection- Section 114(d)(2) of title 17, United States Code, is amended– (1) in subparagraph (A)– (A) in clause (ii), by striking `and’ after the semicolon; (B) in clause (iii), by adding `and’ after the semicolon; and (C) by adding after clause (iii) the following: `(iv) the transmitting entity takes no affirmative steps to authorize, enable, cause or induce the making of a copy or phonorecord by or for the transmission recipient and uses… [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 2:05 pm
In such situations, the SPAC may raise additional funds through a private placement of SPAC securities. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:27 pm
Mass. 1-11-24) (complaint) (1) As in previous complaints related to university antisemitism, I find that the strongest claims are that (a) the university refuses to enforce its own, content-neutral, rules (In this context, for example, I can't see any legitimate reason for HLS to allow pro-Hamas students to take over Casperson lounge); and (b) the university reacts quite differently to complaints of antisemitism than it does to complaints of other sorts of bias,… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:23 am
I know from firsthand experience. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
I. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 10:39 am
Requirements Here, the amendment does provide the Secretary and FinCEN with its typical discretion. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
But it does not change the thrust of the act of identifying the plausible--one is looking for what one wants to find; that is the threshold of the plausible. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis IX. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 11:55 am
(Interestingly, Kansas State University submitted an amicus brief on behalf of Yeasin, arguing that Title IX does not require universities to police off-campus conduct.) [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm
In a series of posts preceding the oral argument in Hobby Lobby (see especially Posts IIIand IX, as well as posts III-Aand III-B, in my compendium) I explained that the litigation had proceeded, in the lower courts and in most of the briefs, on the basis of a fundamental misconception. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 1:12 pm
”[ix] Ct. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
The following chart illustrates the differences between schedules I through V: Schedule Controlled Substances Act Statutory Provision List of Scheduled Substances I Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:35 am
Until the DoE became that nutjob. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:47 pm
To keep the post manageable, however, I’ll start with an introduction to both cases and walk through CBOCS in this post. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 2:49 am
The term telecommunications party does not only cover service providers of mobile- and fixed telephony and internet. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
[i] Electronic “predictive coding” devices that automate the “reading” of thousands of records for making production for electronic discovery, present such problems. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
And then there are endowment payouts from money accumulated through donations by alumni and others. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 5:08 am
Does she keep her free NYU apartment, a big deal in New York City? [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:45 am
I’m also perplexed why Section 230 didn’t play a role here. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 8:20 am
This rule applies to all farm leases, including those entered into before 2010 and continued effective through auto-renewal. [read post]
