Search for: "Ed Kennedy"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,511
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2018, 10:58 am
Ely Jr. wrote in The Guardian of Every Other Right: A Constitutional History of Property Rights (2d ed. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
” Alan Loncar praises Kennedy’s legacy in an op-ed for the Oakland Press; Lawrence Norden is more critical with an op-ed at Newsday. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 4:07 am
Make no mistake, however: As Justice Kennedy himself unambiguously signals in his separate opinion, the President is, indeed, “disregard[ing] the Constitution and the rights it proclaims and protects” (Kennedy op. at 1), and thereby violating his oath of office, by continuing to enforce the Travel Ban. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
[Daily Caller] * Speaking of mistakes, Ed Whelan sets Ben Shapiro straight on Judge Brett Kavanaugh, a leading contender to replace Justice Kennedy. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:12 pm
“Without Kennedy, the Future of Gay Rights Is Fragile”: Law professors Kent Greenfield and Adam Winkler have this op-ed in today’s edition of The New York Times. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 10:05 am
“Anthony Kennedy and the Privatization of Meaning”: Columnist David Brooks has this op-ed in today’s edition of The New York Times. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 10:04 am
“There was one unifying theme of Anthony Kennedy’s jurisprudence”: Columnist Charles Lane has this op-ed in today’s edition of The Washington Post. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
” Additional commentary on Kennedy’s tenure comes from Dave Rodkey at Jurist and Bruce Ledewitz, also at Jurist, Elizabeth Slattery in an op-ed for The Washington Examiner, Paul Smith for this blog, and Counting to 5 (podcast). [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:09 pm
New York Magazine (Jun. 27, 2018): Steps the Next Supreme Court Might Take to Roll Back Abortion Rights, by Ed Kilgore: With the announcement of Justice Kennedy's imminent retirement comes the prospect of a much more conservative Supreme Court, particularly... [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 am
In court, instead of building their political-economic vision through the old constitutional claims of property and contract rights and substantive due process of the Lochner era, these groups today use different doctrinal tools, of which perhaps the most powerful is the newly “weaponiz[ed]” First Amendment.* The objectives, and the political-economic stakes, remain the same.The Roberts-Kennedy Court, as perhaps the first years of the Roberts Court may eventually be… [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
In short, Sotomayor summarized, the court “blindly accept[ed] the government’s misguided invitation to sanction a discriminatory policy motivated by animosity toward a disfavored group, all in the name of a superficial claim of national security, [in the process] redeploying the same dangerous logic underlying Korematsu. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:20 am
A couple months ago, I wrote an op-ed for the Miami Herald suggesting just that. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Tim Wu argues that Monday’s decision in Ohio v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:17 am
Rev. 201, 201– 202 (1994) (footnotes omitted).Justice Kennedy has a short concurring opinion that is joined by Roberts, Alito, and Gorsuch. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote on behalf of the majority. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
Kennedy, a pivotal vote whose future on the bench is a matter of intense speculation. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
” Commentary and analysis come from Curt Levey in an op-ed for Fox News, Krebs on Security, Jon Schuppe at NBC News, Erica Goldberg at PrawfsBlawg, and Garrett Epps at The Atlantic. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
” Additional coverage of Kennedy’s concurrence comes from Amanda Reilly at E&E News, who reports that “[t]he remarks by Kennedy, who is seen as the court’s moderate justice, could reinvigorate the debate over the doctrine’s future. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
Justice Alito, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, and Gorsuch, upheld the legislation. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 6:48 pm
As Professor Richard Pildes explained in a New York Times op-ed yesterday, “The court’s rejection of statewide challenges in the Wisconsin case will make gerrymandering litigation more complex. [read post]
