Search for: "Edward J. May" Results 361 - 380 of 1,706
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2014, 1:46 pm by Jules M. Haas
The existence of a valid Power may obriate the need for an Article 81 Guardianship proceeding. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:11 am by Chuck Ramsay
One Hennepin County judge wrote in a source code order that it may be malpractice for a lawyer not to seek breath test software. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:50 am by Chuck Ramsay
One Hennepin County judge wrote in a source code order that it may be malpractice for a lawyer not to seek breath test software. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:25 pm by Meg Martin
Grant, Judge.Representing Werner Enterprises, Inc: Patrick J. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:35 am
Last Friday, May 29 the Northern District held its tenth annual pro bono awards ceremony. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
Thanks to this Eleonora's lovely conceptual map you will get a clearer picture of what events may occur in the life of a national EU trade mark, starting from the notion of "sign" to registration and anything after that, ie infringement, invalidity, revocation, and much more.* Why it may not be possible to provide a comprehensive explanation of trademarksTrade mark law may be hard, says Neil, but is it even harder to address trade marks in an analytically… [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Edward [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014, at para. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 12:48 am
 Details of the event can be found here and to register please click here.Big brains to meet in Brussels at EPLAW congress:  This year's EPLAW congress is being held this Friday in Brussels where the likes of Kevin Mooney (Simmons & Simmons), Pierre Véron (Véron & Associes) , Edward Nodder (Bristows), Klaus Haft (Hoyng Rokh Monegier), Benjamin Ostapuk (Intel), Penny Gilbert (Powell Gilbert) and József Tálas (Sar… [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 10:16 am
Tips up, LLC Citation: 2008 WY 64 Docket Number: S-07-0159 Appeal from the District Court of Teton County, the Nancy J. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 2:06 pm by admin
Last year, Professor Christopher J. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In relation to qualified privilege, Tugendhat J ruled ([2009] EWHC 1550 (QB)), in relation to publication of both the email and the VPR that publication to employees of the Council who were “customer facing staff” that may come in to contact with Ms Clift was protected, but that publication to employees in other council departments or to any external “partner organisations”, was not, since it was not reasonable to conclude that any risk existed to those… [read post]