Search for: "Elliott v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2011, 12:37 pm
The EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:04 am
See Artiglio v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 9:00 am
(Elliott Associates v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 7:31 am
A group of professors of American and German securities law submitted an amicus brief to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Elliott Associates v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 1:14 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:24 am
In Bray v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:53 am
The $25,000 fine issued by the court in that case, known as R. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:25 am
The controlled substances involved included the Schedule II drug OxyContin, the Schedule III drug Vicodin, the Schedule IV drug Xanax, and the Schedule V drug cough syrup with codeine. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 6:52 pm
Celebrating 30 years of Biotechnology Innovation: From Diamond v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:27 pm
& Elliott, Inc. (1997), United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 4:10 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:05 am
Simon, 51 Ohio St. 233; State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:06 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:17 am
Elliott Barrow, Jr. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:21 am
While the trial court judge had ruled that the Defendant had to be served at her place of business for venue to be proper in Philadelphia, the Superior Court instead found that Rule 402(a) "clearly states that service may be effected by 'handing a copy to the defendant.'" According to an article on the case by Amaris Elliott-Engel in the June 9, 2011 Legal Intelligencer, the case of Silver v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm
It has been nearly a year since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Morrision v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 2:06 pm
In Elliott v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:16 pm
The case is Schindler Elevator Corp. v United States, 10-188. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
10 May 2011, 7:57 am
Supreme Court's 2004 ruling in Banks v. [read post]