Search for: "English v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 6,446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
In Krupski v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 1:59 am
AS v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 10:44 am
Los Angeles Details: United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 8:44 am
The UK Supreme Court will be making a decision in the case of Rademacher v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 11:00 pm
The third section of the article focuses on ongoing litigation in Binyam Mohamed v Secretary of State and Al Rawi v Secretary of State, where the Claimants attempt to expose the role played by the British Government in their detention at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:24 am
In Dexia Crediop S.P.A. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:55 am
Many Plain English readers will be interested in the case of Skinner v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:23 am
In Judulang v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 2:17 pm
" National Assoc. of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 3:23 pm
Another judgment, another instance of the English court seizing jurisdiction in a patent dispute. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 9:37 pm
I was delighted to have the opportunity to teach in the Penn State Law-Universidad Latina de Panamá Program on the Legal English in the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 5:06 pm
Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm
The Court’s reasoning Silber J considered the case of R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport [2008] UKHL 15 and concluded that even though that case is awaiting a ruling from the Grand Chamber in Strasbourg, he was bound by the House of Lords’ ruling that the prohibitions on political advertising contained in sections 319 and 321 of the 2003 Act were justified as being necessary in a democratic society and… [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:08 am
However she stated since this was not a remedy sought by the appellants the Court should invite further submissions before finally deciding the outcome of the appeal. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 12:55 pm
The Court did decide one case this week, United Student Aid Funds v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:52 am
The court stated that as no “preclusionary rule” existed, it did not need to resolve the broader question of whether the law of contempt provided sufficient protection in cases of contempt. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am
In brief, the case of R v Egan [1992] 4 All ER 470 had stated (without the court having heard full argument) that the previous case of R v Lloyd [1967] 1 QB 175 legitimised two approaches to defining ‘substantial’ in the context of diminished responsibility. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 9:19 am
Syndicate 980 v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 5:00 am
Indeed, he had shortly before accepted some similar arguments in refusing an application for a declaration that a particular form of interim licence agreement would be FRAND in Lenovo v InterDigital ((2024] EWHC 596 (Ch)). [read post]
