Search for: "Eugene Volokh" Results 361 - 380 of 13,687
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2024, 7:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
[“The safest course of action in terms of a possible violation of the NCO would be to refrain from writing or to be interviewed for articles that mention the name of the student with whom you have an NCO (or to retract them if that’s possible). [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm by Stephen Halbrook
"  NRA is represented by two First Amendment super-lawyers – David Cole of the ACLU Foundation and the Conspiracy's own Eugene Volokh. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:18 pm by Steven Calabresi
Eugene McCarthy (D-Minn.) stunned the nation by getting 42% of the vote against incumbent President Lyndon B. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
An interesting and, I think, sound analysis by Greg Lukianoff (FIRE), responding to ACLU National Legal Director (and Georgetown law professor) David Cole's review of Lukianoff & Rikki Schlott's The Canceling of the American Mind in the New York Review of Books. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
I'm not sure where I stand on qualified immunity—I haven't looked at its history closely enough—but I thought this was well put, in Judge Willett's dissent yesterday in Villarreal v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 12:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
[New Mexico law is more pro-defendant in such cases than the laws of many other states.] [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:28 am by Eugene Volokh
["Plaintiff is entitled ... to make his own judgment about whether disclosing his identity under seal to the Court would pose an inordinate risk to his personal safety. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
If you or a friend of yours would be willing to chat by Zoom, phone, or e-mail, please e-mail me at volokh at law.ucla.edu. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff argued (with no opposition from the defendant), Proceeding under a pseudonym is appropriate in this appeal because the facts of the underlying case directly relate to Plaintiff's sensitive health information. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
[No, said the Fifth Circuit, at least when the products were library books, and the questions were about whether the books included sexual content.] [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:52 am by Stephen E. Sachs
On the subject of ChatGPT, per Eugene's post on AI libel: As an originalist delivering the keynote address to a Common Good Constitutionalism symposium, I mentioned that I felt "somewhat like a giraffe being asked to address a meeting of the American Chemical Society. [read post]