Search for: "Fail v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 66,006
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Defendants nonetheless failed to meet their burden of showing that they lacked "constructive notice of the condition and a reasonable time to correct or warn about its existence" (Parietti v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 29 NY3d 1136, 1137 [2017]).On the issue of constructive notice, defendants relied on the testimony of the school's custodian engineer, who stated that she "usually" conducted daily inspections of the building's doors, during which… [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Defendants nonetheless failed to meet their burden of showing that they lacked "constructive notice of the condition and a reasonable time to correct or warn about its existence" (Parietti v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 29 NY3d 1136, 1137 [2017]).On the issue of constructive notice, defendants relied on the testimony of the school's custodian engineer, who stated that she "usually" conducted daily inspections of the building's doors, during which… [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am by Mary B. McCord
After then-President Donald Trump’s election loss in November 2020, loyalists inside and adjacent to his campaign concocted a scheme to have pro-Trump electors in key swing states cast their electoral votes for the failed Republican ticket. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, in 2022 the Legislature enacted a new version of Executive Law § 94 in response to the alleged failings of JCOPE in general. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, in 2022 the Legislature enacted a new version of Executive Law § 94 in response to the alleged failings of JCOPE in general. [read post]
15 May 2024, 5:59 am by Kenan Farrell
Circle City Broadcasting I, LLC d/b/a WISH-TV (SD 2/21/2024) – The Defendant filed its Answer on April 19, 2024, including the following affirmative defenses: Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
15 May 2024, 3:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claim pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) because he failed to state a cause of action (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]). [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The issue raised on appeal is whether Supreme Court properly struck respondent's unverified answer (see Matter of Atwood v Pridgen, 142 AD3d 1278, 1279 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 945 [2016]).Petitioners failed to reject respondent's answer and deem it a nullity based upon the lack of a verification (see CPLR 3022). [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The issue raised on appeal is whether Supreme Court properly struck respondent's unverified answer (see Matter of Atwood v Pridgen, 142 AD3d 1278, 1279 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 945 [2016]).Petitioners failed to reject respondent's answer and deem it a nullity based upon the lack of a verification (see CPLR 3022). [read post]