Search for: "Fails v. Virginia State Bar" Results 361 - 380 of 765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia ruled that the wastewater discharge permit issued to the Fola Coal Company by the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection incorporated the state’s narrative biological water quality conditions. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:30 am by Phil Dixon
The petitioner thus failed to meet the “high bar” required to overturn the state court judgment, and the judgment was affirmed. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:34 am
" In a lot of cases that means a state court action filed after a failed federal court class action. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:27 am by INFORRM
There are obvious parallels with the famous “Pentagon Papers” case,  New York Times v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:13 am by Erik Weibust and Andrew Stark
This could create confusion in states in which the inevitable disclosure doctrine is not permitted by state law (e.g., California, Maryland, and Virginia). [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:07 am by Jeff Gamso
Virginia) and those who were under 18 at the time of their crime (Roper v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
Lee, 15-789, the Court held that California’s procedural default rule barring claims raised for the first time on state collateral review was sufficiently firmly established and regularly followed to legitimately bar review of habeas claims, shockingly resulting in a reversal of the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm by cdw
State, 959 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 2007), and Nixon v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
Having duked the matter out in the United States Patents and Trademarks Office, and subsequently at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the matter has moved on to the District Court of Virginia, where the decision was handed down only a few days ago.Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]