Search for: "Federal Insurance Co. v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 1,559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2008, 5:04 am
Co. of North Am., No. 06-CV-00545, filed February 9, 2006, in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, and certified as a nationwide class action (covering a class that, according to defense attorneys, includes annuity transactions that “overlap those in Negrete”); and Castello v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The title of the article is The Quiet Coup, and it's introductory paragraph changed my whole year… The crash has laid bare many unpleasant truths about the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Bexis
  The court held otherwise, finding the claims to be “squarely within the parameters” of Buckman Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm by Steven Boutwell
Another group of courts found that the exclusion was ambiguous or required to be interpreted based on history of the exclusion and looked at the presentations of the insurance industry to the various insurance commissioners in the various states “Doer v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:41 am
So, for example, the Court held that federal taxes on corporate capital (Pacific Insurance v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 8:00 am by Christopher Simon
Georgia Car Accidents and Out of State Uninsured Motorist Insurance Trying a Trucking Case in Federal Court this Week [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 11:00 am by Jeremy Tyler
Co., 790 So. 2d 570, 571 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) as state court recognition of the distinction, albeit on grounds of failure to provide information relating to settlement of an insurance claim. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am by Wolfgang Demino
Bicron Corp., 416 U.S. 470, 479 (1974)), or when it “interferes with the methods by which the federal statute was designed to reach [its] goal,” Int’l Paper Co. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am by Wolfgang Demino
Bicron Corp., 416 U.S. 470, 479 (1974)), or when it “interferes with the methods by which the federal statute was designed to reach [its] goal,” Int’l Paper Co. v. [read post]