Search for: "Federal v. Sears" Results 361 - 380 of 396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2009, 3:16 am by Russ Bensing
  And if there’s any lingering doubts, tell everyone to look up State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am by Robert Liles
Nevertheless, federal prosecutors have continued to aggressively prosecute alleged violations of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06  OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 2:06 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
Justice Lebous believed none of it, issuing a searing written decision holding Zaven and Jo Ann in contempt. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 10:01 pm by Tom
To identify its meaning, one must consult almost two decades worth of Federal Reports, searching for cases describing or enforcing the judicially-created crime of honest-services fraud, before this Court rejected them all as exceeding the judicial function in McNally v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  The SCA generally prohibits disclosure to federal or state governments of certain email messages and metadata, but this prohibition yields to U.S. court orders that meet the following criteria:  “A court order for disclosure . . . shall issue only if the governmental entity [seeking the order] offers specific and articulable facts showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the contents of a wire or electronic communication, or the records or other… [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In past downturns, we haven’t seen ads like this (v. something staplegunned to a telephone pole). [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Most importantly, however, the person who is $100,000 richer because of her investments pays zero dollars in federal income tax so long as she does not sell the shares.What is going on here? [read post]