Search for: "Fee v. Fee" Results 361 - 380 of 31,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
Sallyport Global Servs., BRB No. 13-0342 (Feb. 7, 2014) (vacating fee award based on procedural deficiencies at the ALJ level); Kadim v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 2:43 am by war
Fitness Australia Ltd v Copyright Tribunal [2010] FCAFC 148 [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:31 am
In order to understand the applicable legal standard for answering the question today, it is necessary first to examine the former mechanism of renunciation and the rule announced by the Florida Supreme Court in Carman v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:23 pm
Many of those subjected to such detention fees (and associated enforcement action) had hoped that the decision of the NSW Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal ("CTTT") in DV Kelly Pty Ltd v China Shipping (Australia) Agency Co Pty Ltd would serve as the basis to cause shipping lines and their agents to review (and reduce) fees and associated enforcement action. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:29 am
http://www.oginski-law.com Listen in as Gerry Oginski, an experienced NY Medical Malpractice, Negligence, Wrongful Death and Personal Injury Trial lawyer practicing law in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, Staten Island, Nassau and Suffolk explain the difference between an attorney's fee in a Negligence case, and an attorney's fee in a medical malpractice case. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 12:44 am
It does not matter that [defendant] requests fees for time spent on appeal because an award under the Patent Act 'is not limited to fees paid for counsel's work at trial.' " Dippin' Dots Inc, v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by Mary Sullivan
Supreme Court decided AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:15 pm by Patricia Salkin
AMCAL Chico LLC v Chico Unified School District, 2020 WL 6498638 (CA App. 11/5/2020) [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 9:20 am by Holland & Hart
That apparent willingness to overturn Abood set up the First Amendment challenge to public union agency fees in this term’s case of Friedrichs v. [read post]