Search for: "Fowler v. Case" Results 361 - 380 of 430
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2010, 12:26 pm by Michael Ginsborg
01/13/10 Christian Science MonitorGerry Shih, Same-Sex Marriage Case, Day 3: The Defense Pushes Back, 01/13/10 NY Times "The Bay Area"Liveblogging Perry v Schwarzenegger – Day 3, Parts 1, 2, 3 and 4, 01/13/10 FireDogLake NewsBob Egelko, Trial topic: Is anti-gay bias still a problem? [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:25 am by Michael Ginsborg
I will select just the articles and posts that I consider especially noteworthy.Day 1 of the trialAndrew Pugno, General Counsel Andy Pugno Comments On Opening Day Of Trial, 01/11/10 ProtectMarriage.com Action FundDan Levine, Gay Couples Testify as Marriage Case Starts, The Recorder (SF legal newspaper), 01/12/10NCLR’s Legal Director Shannon Minter on Perry v Schwarzenegger Proceedings, Day 1, 01/11/10 Pam's House BlendKaren Ocamb, A heavy burden for the Prop 8 defenders,… [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 4:28 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Iqbal: The Fourth Circuit's Decision In Nemet Chevrolet, Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 1:11 pm
Thus he did not make a prima facie case of discrimination in violation of section 132a and did not shift the burden to Gelson’s to establish an affirmative defense.The case is Gelson's Markets, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 12:27 am
Fowler KINGS COUNTY Civil Practice Motion Seeking Judgment on Mechanic's Lien Ruled Barred by Prior Decisions Discharging, Canceling It Klin Construction Group Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 pm
In case we forget who they were, here is when Doriemus won the 1995 Melbourne Cup.This time around, the mother sought to knock out the father's application, based on the Rice and Asplund test, which was visited most recently in Miller v Harrington. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:55 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
(The Publishers also reached a settlement of their case, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 9:58 am
Since Elam liability has not been refuted and the Court can only adjudicate an entire cause of action (i.e. primary right) and not individual facts or theories of liability (Lilienthal & Fowler v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 7:47 am
Neither Terrapin v Builders Supply Co (Hayes) [1967] RPC 375 nor Cranleigh Precision Engineering Ltd v Bryant [1965] 1 WLR 1293 QBD was authority for that proposition [If Kats could blush, this one would be pretty pink -- he's sure he has persuaded a generation of students of the opposite, confident that Speed Seal Products Ltd v Paddington [1985] 1 WLR 1327 CA said this was the case];* There was strong authority for the proposition that publication of… [read post]
JURY'S DAMAGES AWARD TO ACCIDENT VICTIM'S SURVIVING SPOUSE UNDER TEXAS TORT CLAIMS ACT THROWN OUT & CASE DISMISSEDTexas Department of Transportation v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 2:03 am
Hilarie's analysis focuses on Young v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 10:12 am
May 1, 2009)(Willett) (probate case, mere conflict of interest not enough to warrant removal of independent executor of estate) JOHN KAPPUS v. [read post]