Search for: "GENERAL MOTORS HOLDINGS LLC"
Results 361 - 380
of 431
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(EFF) United States US General US Chamber of Commerce cites #19 rank, wants tougher IP laws (Ars Technica) USPTO Director David Kappos blogs (Securing Innovation) Kappos sets goals for new PTO administration (Inventive Step) (Patents4Life) US Patent Reform Tech companies send letter on patent reform to Secretary Locke (Patent Docs) US Patents Summary of local patent rules affecting claim construction practice (Part 3 of 5) (Gray on Claims) Did you know...… [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 1:38 pm
Affinity Labs of Texas LLC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
With the exception of Hayes Lemmerz Finance LLC - Luxembourg S.C.A. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
There will be virtually no money in the bankruptcy court to pay any sums to tort claimants who have cases against Chrysler, LLC and only a small sum available to tort claimants against General Motors Corporation. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:04 am
Armor Holdings, Inc., 2007 WL 2814650, at *2 (E.D. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:04 am
Armor Holdings, Inc., 2007 WL 2814650, at *2 (E.D. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:04 am
Armor Holdings, Inc., 2007 WL 2814650, at *2 (E.D. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
Armor Holdings, Inc., 2007 WL 2814650, at *2 (E.D. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:56 am
The company's primary customers are Tier I and II automotive suppliers and it counts Ford, General Motors, Chrysler, Audi, Volkswagen, BMW, Fiat, Honda, Mercedes, Porsche, PSA Peugeot Citroen, Renault/Nissan, and Toyota among its major customers. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
– section 22 orders (IPKat) IP Court Users’ Committee publishes ‘Working Group’s Consultation on Proposals for Reform of the Patents County Court’ (PatLit) IPO holds ‘trade mark surgery’ (Class 46) United States US General David Kappos confirmation hearing (IP Watchdog) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Maier & Maier) (Patent Docs) To… [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Why becoming generic might be good for a trade mark (IPKat) Good old days of counterfeiting in Hong Kong? [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
Under pressure from multiple consumer advocate groups, as well as State Attorneys General, General Motors Corporation agreed to assume legal responsibility for injuries drivers suffered from product liability and vehicle defects after General Motors emerges from bankruptcy protection. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 9:14 am
As the sale process in the bankruptcy of General Motors nears completion, much has been learned from Chrysler. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 9:14 am
As the sale process in the bankruptcy of General Motors nears completion, much has been learned from Chrysler. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 10:19 am
Strike Holdings LLC, NY Slip Op 05630 (1st Dept. 2009), decided July 2, 2009. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 6:40 pm
On Monday, July 6, 2009, just over one month after filing for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, Judge Gerber approved a sale of substantially all of General Motors' valuable assets to a new company known as "New GM. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 1:53 am
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York on July 6, 200907/06/2009
Order: Decision on Debtors' Motion for Approval of Sale of Assets to Vehicle Acquisition Holdings, LLC (PDF 248 KB)Order Regarding the General Motors Bankruptcy as Filed in the U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:40 am
http://editorial.incisivemedia.com/c/19sIhKqaA5XJGTALV
Bondholders Give Up GM Fight, Citing Lack of Resources
The American Lawyer
Patton Boggs' Michael Richman tells The Am Law Daily that the group of bondholders who oppose the plan to sell General Motors out of bankruptcy will not appeal a judge's ruling Sunday approving that sale. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:34 am
The opinion also discusses generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") relevant to financial statements of consolidated entities. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
General Motors Corporation Issue: Does the Americans with Disabilities Act permit an employer to reduce the retirement benefits of disabled workers because they receive federal disability benefits and do the ADA’s anti-discrimination protections apply to disabled former employees? [read post]
