Search for: "GRANT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 361 - 380 of 3,829
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2010, 9:21 am by Gene Quinn
On Monday, December 13, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued a non-decision in the matter of Costco Wholesale Corporation v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am by SHG
The last phrase of this rule was the part that gave Justice Sam Alito pause in his concurring opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 2:39 pm by Brooke Wahlberg
On December, 10, 2018, the United States Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari in Kisor  v. [read post]
On Monday, October 24, the United States Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) confirmed that it did not appeal the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Trafigura Trading LLC v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something… [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Ken White
The United States Department of Justice is using federal grand jury subpoenas to identify anonymous commenters engaged in typical internet bluster and hyperbole in connection with the Silk Road prosecution. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm by Amy Howe
Washington, in which the justices will consider whether a plaintiff must pursue all available administrative remedies through the state to be eligible to bring a federal civil rights claim; and Department of State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 11:50 am by Amy Howe
They granted a petition filed by Pankajkumar Patel, a citizen of India who came to the United States without authorization nearly 30 years ago. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am by Josh Blackman
All nine Justices also agreed that these board members are not "officers of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:03 pm by Jeff Gamso
It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury v. [read post]