Search for: "General Electric, Inc"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2015, 8:57 am
In an opinion that traces the “winding legal background” on the supervisory status of electrical dispatchers and the NLRA’s supervisory criteria generally, the First Circuit noted that the NLRB had long held electrical dispatchers were not supervisory or managerial employees. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:46 am
Naylor Group Inc. v Ellis-Don Construction Ltd., [1996] OJ No 3247, 31 CLR (2d) 195 (ON Gen Div), revd [1999] 119 OAC 182 (ONCA), vard 2001 SCC 58, [2001] 2 SCR 943, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2001/2001scc58/2001scc58.html This is not a tender dispute between an owner and a bidder, but between a general contractor and a subcontractor whose prices were used to secure a low bid. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:46 am
Naylor Group Inc. v Ellis-Don Construction Ltd., [1996] OJ No 3247, 31 CLR (2d) 195 (ON Gen Div), revd [1999] 119 OAC 182 (ONCA), vard 2001 SCC 58, [2001] 2 SCR 943, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2001/2001scc58/2001scc58.html This is not a tender dispute between an owner and a bidder, but between a general contractor and a subcontractor whose prices were used to secure a low bid. [read post]
20 May 2011, 2:56 pm
The wired segments allow data communication through electrically conducting lines that also carry telephone signals, electrical power, or cable television signals. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 10:41 pm
The government awarded $8 billion in loans to Ford Motor Co., Nissan Motor Co. and Tesla Motors Inc. in June to develop environmentally friendly cars. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 2:45 am
Belmora's FLANAXOctober 24, 2013 - 2 PM: In re SpaceCo Business Solutions, Inc., Serial Nos. 85198235 [Section 2(d) refusal to register ADAPT for "desktop LED lighting fixtures for use in commercial and industrial lighting applications ordered through specialty office furnishings ordering services" in light of the registered mark EDAPT for "electrical lighting fixtures"].October 29, 2013 - 2 PM: In re ActiveVideo Network, Inc., Serial No. 77967935 [Refusal to register… [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 7:32 am
In General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:58 pm
., Inc. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
Steiner Electric Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:52 am
Zimmer Inc. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
They state that, "The elimination of coal as a fuel for new electric generation would have highly concerning implications for electricity prices and for the economy and job-creation in general, as well as the competitiveness of American manufacturing." [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 8:25 am
Burning natural gas generated far less damage than coal, both overall and per kilowatt-hour of electricity generated. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:11 pm
General Electric Co., 272 U.S. 476 (1926) was implicitly overruled by the Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:02 pm
This generally means removing hazards like icy stairways, large holes in the floor or live electric wires. [read post]
21 May 2009, 11:50 am
BC Hydro and an incredible 13 intervenors submitted written arguments to the BCUC in what has been a very thorough and hotly contested examination of the future of electricity generation in this province. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:28 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.September 1, 2015 - 2 PM: In re PTT, LLC dba High 5 Games, Serial No. 86035890 [Section 2(d) refusal of EMPRESS JOSEPHINE for "game software," in view of the registered mark NAPOLEON AND JOSEPHINE for "Components for gaming machines that generate or display wager outcomes, namely, controllers, displays, button panels, bolsters, electrical wiring, and computer hardware and… [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 4:36 am
December 16, 2021 - 2 PM: Belay Mortgage Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:10 am
Consistent with its opinion in the Hunt Construction Group, Inc. et. al. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:10 am
Consistent with its opinion in the Hunt Construction Group, Inc. et. al. v. [read post]
