Search for: "Generes v. Justice Court (People) (1980)"
Results 361 - 380
of 723
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2013, 6:40 pm
The case was filed in 1980; it was 1985 before the Supreme Court issued its decision and remanded the case to the lower court. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:03 pm
The current Supreme Court has at least two members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:38 am
Since Ewing, the second proposition has generally been left alone. [read post]
5 May 2019, 8:18 am
Supreme Court in 1927—in a case flowing out of the infamous “Teapot Dome Scandal”—in McGrain v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Virginia (1980). [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
This question has generated inconsistent holdings among the circuits, even in cases with almost identical fact patterns. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 7:31 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy joined the Court's liberal wing in that case because of his conclusion, rooted in constitutional history, that states warrant special solicitude when they challenge federal government inaction. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 11:00 pm
Hot Coffee Hot Coffee begins with the notorious Liebeck v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Consider Chief Justice Warren’s laconic statement in Loving v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
He raised his glass and he said: “Competent powers to Congress for general purposes. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 4:03 pm
Katz in a widely read blog entitled Access Copyright v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
January 9, 2009 PRELIMINARY MEMORANDUM OF THE JUSTICE ROBERT H. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:49 am
McRae, 448 U.S. 297, 318 (1980). [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm
On reflection: Dietemann v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:00 am
Supreme Court, in the case of Bush v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
This could result in no postponement of limitation periods for people involved in motor vehicle accidents in which vehiclar damage occurs. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union gave judgment in Case C-435/12 ACI Adam BV and Others v Stichting de Thuiskopie, Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding deciding that "The amount of the levy payable for making private copies of a protected work may not take unlawful reproductions into account. [read post]
