Search for: "German v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 3,578
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2022, 6:37 am
Its temporary (but indefinite) withdrawal from the German market enables the high-volume smartphone maker (and its OnePlus affiliate) to stand its ground in court:Motions to stay the enforcement of those four injunctions are pending, and while I can't predict what the appeals courts in Munich and Karlsruhe (the latter for the Mannheim rulings) will do, there are serious issues that may very well prove outcome-determinative.OPPO is now aggressively seeking its own German patent… [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:39 am
Surely it is curious that the Court of Justice (CJEU) dealt with these issues in two recent decisions, both issued last April 28th and both following requests for preliminary rulings under Article 267 TFEU by German Courts, namely cases C-531/20 (NovaText GmbH v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:36 am
Surely it is curious that the Court of Justice (CJEU) dealt with these issues in two recent decisions, both issued last April 28th and both following requests for preliminary rulings under Article 267 TFEU by German Courts, namely cases C-531/20 (NovaText GmbH v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:38 pm
In fact, the first German Ericsson v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 4:05 pm
(See Zuckerman v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:38 pm
TCL and Philips v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 7:11 am
(see Jacobsen v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:25 am
I have great respect for all the parties to Moderna v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 6:14 am
Since OPPO's indefinite withdrawal from the German market became known earlier this month, I've been hoping for more information on the state of play between the smartphone maker and Nokia. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 10:56 am
Sys. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
While not directly comparable, this is similar to the position affirmed by the Court in Gillette v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:10 pm
"] From the Virginia Supreme Court's decision in Loudoun County School Bd. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 3:32 am
Matthias Zigann) announced its decision in K.Mizra v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 7:37 am
Duchimaza v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Hardison, 432 US 63, 84 (1977). [2] See, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 2:07 pm
OPPO hasn't closed down its German subsidiary, and customers continue to receive support; and unlike in the Colombian Ericsson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 12:07 am
"At first sight, Société du Figaro et al. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 8:25 am
Pierfrancesco Rossi, Italian courts and the evolution of the law of State immunity: A reassessment of Judgment no 238/2014 Giulia Berrino, The impact of Article 43 of Decree-Law no 36/2022 on enforcement proceedings regarding German State-owned assets [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 7:22 am
The Commission Implementing Regulation No 1329/2014 (point 9 of Annex IV to Form V) does not have a bearing on this decision as it can only implement but not modify the Regulation (para. 73). [read post]
