Search for: "Givens v. Clarke"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm
Clarke, 675 F.3d 732, 734 (7th Cir. 2012) (citing Wikipedia entry, in the context of an Eighth Amendment challenge, for the proposition that an anal fissure "is no fun at all"), United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:16 pm
The case he mentions is Clark v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
On Thursday 8 March the same panel (L Phillips, L Clarke, L Dyson, L Sumption and L Reed) will hear Marcus Jason Daniel v The State, another appeal from the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago concerning whether fresh evidence as to the appellant’s mental health should be admitted and the case remitted to the Court of Appeal to consider the safety of the conviction. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:45 am
Marshak v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
See Barnett v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:41 pm
Ms Clarke was given permission to amend her JR claim and did so. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
Given the factual backdrop, however, it is unsurprising that the majority reached the decision that they did. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:12 am
V. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:34 pm
" It was given an "official" citation when it was issued. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
Our second relist is a capital case, Clark v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 9:18 am
V. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
Or is it merely another instance of sloppy treatment of a consumer debt case that is considered a low priority given the small amount in controversy, compared to tort and business-vs-business cases? [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:41 am
Warburton, 11 N.J. 418, 426 (1953) (deficiencies in expert’s qualifications go to weight given to expert’s opinion; sufficient evidence of qualifications permits the expert to testify, “leaving to the jury the determination of its worth”); Angel v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 9:22 am
Clark v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 10:43 am
In the third set of proceedings, Mr Williams sought possession against Mr Lewis and Mr Clarke. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:17 am
" But then in House v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 10:39 am
See Miller v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:21 am
So it is Torres for Clark. [read post]
