Search for: "Givens v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 361 - 380
of 446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
” 11We believe the civil union law created a burdensome and flawedstatutory scheme that fails to afford same-sex couples the samerights and remedies provided to heterosexual married couples asrequired … by the New Jersey Supreme Court and its landmarkLewis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
But legal experts say it is hard to see how donation matching could happen given campaign contribution limits. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:02 pm
Marriage, for them as for others parents, provides a clear framework of entitlements and responsibilities, as well as security, legitimacy, and social standing for their children. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Indian Patent Office decisions now searchable and downloadable: (Indian Patent Oppositions), (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (Spicy IP), Institute for Progress study on inter partes re-examination: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IAM), (Hal Wegner) Nintendo loses patent suit over 3D controller; Anascape awarded $21M in damages: motion for… [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 1:13 pm
In addition to the scheduled events mentioned here, there are a number of issues that merit watching but that do not have a fixed date for developments to take place: ACA Internat’l v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
Tobacco Securities Trust Co. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Bank v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am
On Feb. 11, after Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas was confirmed, DHS announced that it would begin Phase 1 of a program to restore processing for those individuals already enrolled. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
Department of Homeland Security, Diallo v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
It gave McIntyre a life-long interest in the subject in general and a particular fondness for Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.[7] Given this deep affinity between philosophy and law, one might expect to see explicit references to the major philosophers in the decisions written by judges.[8] This study discusses the extent to which this is true. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
The policies easily collide, given courts’ responsibility of review of the validity of the public use, while at the same time recognizing that deference must be given to the legislative body that approved the taking. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
[I don’t think I can attribute statements given where I am in the room and what I can see.] [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 7:00 am
They must also be given acces [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
They could frustrate government responses to social problems in a way not seen in America since the Great Depression. [read post]
