Search for: "Good v. State of California" Results 361 - 380 of 7,480
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2008, 5:49 am
On some days, it's hard to get back into the routine.We'd rather keep mining the depths of Colacicco to see what nuggets we can unearth there.But we owe it to you to provide a short post about the California Supreme Court's decision in Johnson v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 9:41 am
This test was formulated by the California Supreme Court in Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 3:00 am
    Last week, California's Sixth Appellate district issued a decision in Sisemore v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
In comparison to other states, California boasts a higher number of statutes and regulations. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 1:09 am
So held San Diego's Fourth District Court of Appeal today in a ruling that's bound to bring a smile to the faces of everyone who has ever been declared a vexatious litigant in California. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:20 pm
  Which seems would have a very good shot at success here. [read post]
This second installment in our series on the upcoming legal challenge to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in California v. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 5:48 am by Nassiri Law
While this is good news, we fully anticipate this change will coincide with a rise in California wage and hour lawsuits. [read post]
The case that was previously posted on and that is currently under review by the California Supreme Court is People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 11:44 am by Kevin Kaufman
With many state legislative sessions wrapping up for this year, and a new fiscal year about to begin, it’s a good time to examine some of the 2021 legislative trends—and sports betting taxes are among the more prominent. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Paul L. Singer
Section 1749.8.9: This section directs online marketplaces to alert law enforcement agencies in California if they know that a third-party seller is selling or attempting to sell stolen goods to a California resident. [read post]
California voters amended their state constitution to prohibit the state from interfering with an individual’s reproductive freedom. [read post]