Search for: "Goodwill v. Goodwill"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2020, 12:36 pm
Sonner v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm
Hamilton International Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 10:44 am
Grimm v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 10:44 am
Grimm v. [read post]
12 Sep 2020, 9:29 am
Services of Florida Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 10:42 am
Maui Jim, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 1:37 pm
Identity Theft: Joshi v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 6:56 am
GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 pm
The California Supreme Court in the 2008 case, Edwards v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 8:15 am
In a recent trademark passing off case, TFI Foods Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 8:15 am
In a recent trademark passing off case, TFI Foods Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:06 pm
DNA Sports Performance Lab, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 11:41 pm
I, recently, had a client that was very worried about losing “goodwill. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 5:51 am
An example of this occurred in the case of Hedden v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 1:32 pm
As the General Court had established in T-111/16, Prada v EUIPO, a well-known trade mark (as 'PRADA' and 'BOSS' are) enjoys extended protection, but no protection is available when the latter’s sign fails to establish a link with it (as it was for 'THE RICH PRADA' and hotel services in that case, and 'BOSS SHOT' and the goods mentioned above here). [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 7:41 am
On June 30, 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:36 pm
Also, "[l]oss of intangible assets such as reputation and goodwill can constitute irreparable injury. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 10:05 am
O’Neill v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 1:36 am
In Rolex S.A. v FMTM Distribution Ltd [2020] SGIPOS 6, FMTM Distribution Ltd filed an application in the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (“IPOS”) to register “MARINER” in Class 14, inter alia for horological instruments (or in a word, “watches”). [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 10:42 am
Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]