Search for: "Grant v. Commonwealth" Results 361 - 380 of 1,614
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2018, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A contract violating Section 4 78 is illegal “and under our settled rules [New York courts] refuse to aid in it but leave the parties where they are” (Spivak, 16 NY2d at 168, citing McConnell v Commonwealth Pictures Corp., 7 NY2d 465 [1960]; see also El Gamayel v Seaman, 72 NY2d 701, 705 [1988] [“As a matter of public policy, a contract to provide services in violation of [Judiciary Law§ 478] is unenforceable in our state… [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 11:19 am by Daniel E. Cummins
For the latest social media discovery decision, check out the Northampton County Court of Common Pleas ruling in Allen v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm by Deborah Heller
U.S (17-6086): Cert. in this case was only granted on the fourth issue presented by the petitioner, which is whether the Sex Offender Notification and Registration Act (SORNA) delegation to the Attorney General to issue regulations under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 1:17 am by INFORRM
In doing so, the New Zealand Court of Appeal followed the view expressed by the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127 and the Supreme Court of Canada in Grant v Torstar Corp [2009] 3 SCR 640. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 3:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:10 am by Barry Sookman
This work augments our notice-and-action model and builds upon our strong cooperation with law enforcement, trusted flaggers and our community of users.[6] Canada and other Commonwealth country courts take an approach that is similar to the approach under the EU Ecommerce Directive. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 9:24 pm by William D. Kickham, Esq.
But in my view as a Boston Massachusetts felony defense lawyer, the key to seeing through to the real source of this judicial liberalism, which caused Mickey Rivera to be released on bail in the first place last fall (2017), isn’t so much the judge who first released Rivera last fall (judge McGuire), as it was the Supreme Judicial Court’s instructions to Massachusetts judges on bail procedures, in its August 2017 decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]