Search for: "Grant v. People"
Results 361 - 380
of 16,996
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2014, 1:50 pm
Thomas, the court in the case of People v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
How many people are granted bail each day? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Wheeldin v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:18 pm
So, as a direct result of the state's failure, criminal charges against various defendants are dismissed.This is one of those rare cases in which the highest tribunal of a state rightly grants review to make clear that the lower courts are right and that an executive-level official (here, the Riverside DA) should stop making contrary claims. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:12 pm
(Which is also why the Court of Appeal granted a stay of Salter's release.) [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 3:07 pm
The Court granted the application for leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:15 pm
The Court of Appeals reconsidered application of the exclusionary rule in People v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:59 am
Take King v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:34 am
McManus v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 1:33 pm
” He noted that lawyers can request such assistance, and judges often grant those requests, “but some jurisdictions are barely paying the lawyers, much less the ancillary people on the defense team. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
In Murdock v Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943), the U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm
Littebrant, 55 AD3d 1151, 1154, [2008] [juror with professional and long-term personal relationship with key defense witness properly excused for cause]; People v Bedard, 132 AD3d 1070 [3d Dept 2015] [friendship with District Attorney required granting of a for cause challenge]; People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:10 am
In the Arizona SB1070 preliminary injunction case, the District Court cited Fourth Amendment implications of detentions on people detained for lack of papers which factored into the decision to grant the preliminary injunction. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 10:13 am
In SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 10:27 am
Feel constrained to do so by Rule 4.435, which says that you can only take into account events existing at the time probation was granted? [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:29 am
We don’t want to tell the judge not to grant our motion to dismiss. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:09 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 1:29 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:34 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 5:02 am
"What, No Tipping the People's Servants? [read post]
