Search for: "Grant v. Strong"
Results 361 - 380
of 7,058
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2023, 11:23 am
Case Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:47 am
The public interest in openness is particularly strong in this case. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
The background of Sackett v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
The background of Sackett v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
The background of Sackett v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:56 am
The Lerner Decision In May 2014, the First Department issued Lerner v Prince (119 AD3d 122 [1st Dept 2014]). [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 2:40 am
Justifying his decision to file the motion, Fleischman cited the 1972 case Barker v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
From Dabiri v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 12:08 pm
A buyer convincing a seller that an item of value is actually a ‘dupe’ or is fake and obtaining that item at a cost, based on the false pretence that the item is worth less than it otherwise would be Inflating the value of assets on a statement in writing to obtain a grant or extension of credit Defences A strong defence to a charge of obtaining property by false pretences will depend on the circumstances of one’s case. [read post]
29 May 2023, 10:16 am
If, as appears to be the case, the moratoria were simply granted to give Ms Lees protection from enforcement and not as part of an overall process of seeking to sort out her financial affairs and develop a plan for her to pay her debts, then there is a strong case that the moratoria were granted for an improper purpose. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
Cadwalladr stated that if her domestic appeals fail, “we believe we have a strong case to take it before the European court of human rights in Strasbourg. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:21 pm
See Chafin v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:11 pm
[Mexico] [Petition granted] [Attorneys fees and costs] In Munoz v Diaz, 2023 WL 139732 ( S.D. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:07 pm
Saldivar v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm
Family Court granted a prohibited-steps order after Bafna-Louis had the opportunity to be heard. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:55 pm
[Spain][Attorneys Fees][Granted in part] In Garcia v Ramsis, 2022 WL 18028257 (E.D. [read post]
ALERT: CHANGE IN LAW – RETALIATION PROTECTION NOW GIVEN TO EMPLOYEES COMPLAINING OF KNOWN VIOLATIONS
25 May 2023, 1:40 pm
Garcia-Brower v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:19 am
"] From C.M. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:16 pm
We apply a “strong presumption” in favor of enforcing mandatory forum-selection clauses. [read post]