Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS"
Results 361 - 380
of 36,562
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
However, to paraphrase Justice Stephen Breyer, writing in Heffernan v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 2:34 pm
This was the case in SnapRays, d/b/a SnapPower v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:58 am
., v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:38 am
See Muldrow v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
See James v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:44 am
Johnson v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:33 am
Not every foreseeable potential harm should be considered a taking. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
The list here is impressive and includes: People v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:01 am
In Doe v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 10:53 am
In the case Jones v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:49 am
Justifying the killing or harming of Palestinians in the name of protecting another nation's security, or on the theory that it is acceptable collateral damage in the other nation's defensive operations. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
Bungie has also provided evidence that the fraudulent notices harmed its reputation and caused it to devote significant resources to attempt to remediate the harm. 512(f) wins are so rare that each one is noteworthy. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
See James v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:00 am
Clem v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 4:00 am
For example, the famous 1976 California Supreme Court case of Tarasoff v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am
Here is how the explanatory note formulates the suspicion: “the Commission is assessing TikTok’s risk management related to its (i) potentially addictive design, (ii) the service’s risk of leading users down ‘rabbit holes’ of harmful content, and (iii) the effectiveness of TikTok’s measures for preventing minors from accessing inappropriate content, in particular age assurance tools. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm
For an individual to qualify for an NPA, the disclosure must meet strict criteria, including the following: (i) the disclosure must involve original information, not something already known to the DOJ; (ii) it must relate to one of six specific legal violations, ranging from money laundering and various types of financial and health care fraud to public corruption; (iii) the individual making the disclosure cannot be the CEO, the CFO, a high-level foreign official, any domestic official, or… [read post]
2 May 2024, 7:36 pm
[1] Vance v. [read post]