Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA" Results 361 - 380 of 2,885
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2014, 3:42 pm by Lovechilde
Dear Madam Attorney General: I write to urge you to not appeal Jones v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 11:40 pm
The court took similar action as to plaintiff's equal protection claim regarding wearing of his Kufi head covering.In Amaker v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:13 pm by Curt Cutting
   I continue to believe that this issue will make its way to the California Supreme Court, but that may not happen until another published Court of Appeal opinion tackles the issue head on. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Progressive sentiment vs. actual progress: Philadelphia bans cashless stores [Jeffrey Miron; related, Billy Binion, Reason (council member thinks city should legislate against “elitism”), Joe Setyon, Reason (NYC)] Meanwhile, heading in the opposite direction: “California bill would require businesses to offer e-receipts” [Don Thompson, Associated Press] “Overhaul CRA? [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:15 am
There, the California Office of Elections Cybersecurity (“OEC”), headed by the California Secretary of State’s office, flagged posts on Facebook and Twitter as erroneous or misleading social media posts. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 9:55 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And so, on January 29, exactly two weeks later,   Baca v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
Carol Williams reporting in the LATimes does a superb job of describing California's Lewis Carroll like parole system for those sentenced to life in prison for murder, with the possibility of parole; a topic which has given the California Supreme Court cause for psycho-therapy and now looms over the 9th Circuit (Hayward v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 12:21 pm
It was uncontested that Martinez had been killed with a single shot to the head. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:22 pm
Today's apparently Rich People's Lawsuit Day in the California Court of Appeal.Defendants and plaintiff are neighbors in a gated community in Bell Canyon. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:04 am by Joy Waltemath
Officiating round two of a dispute over Kmart’s alleged failure to provide “suitable seating” to cashiers in the national retailer’s California stores, a federal judge certified only a narrow class of employees, limited to the store at which the named plaintiff worked, in their suit alleging violations of a state wage order (Delbridge v Kmart Corp, June 11, 2013, Alsup, W). [read post]