Search for: "Hague v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 1,190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2022, 10:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
May 7, 2008) (holding that the parties’ custody agreement that stated that after returning to Colombia the child could move to the United States if he so desired was insufficient to establish the petitioner consented to retention of the child in the United States). [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:01 am by Joel R. Brandes
It agreed with the District Court’s conclusion that Appellant met her burden of showing L.S. was well-settled in the United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:28 am by Joel R. Brandes
Distler, attorneys fees and costs were recoverable to foreign counsel who was not Plaintiff's trial attorney in the United States because the foreign counsel had helped to facilitate the return of the child under the ICARA and similar to Gonzalez, had provided legal advice and attested to Petitioner's rights under the Hague Convention. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:31 am by Paul Stephan
Moreover, if the Supreme Court decides Türkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
After their arrival in the United States, Ingrid and L.S. moved to Brady,  Montana, to move in with Alan. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:57 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 [United Kingdom] [Petition denied][Grave Risk of Harm][Age and Maturity defense] In Garner v Harris, 2922 WL 193470066 (E.D. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:01 am by Joel R. Brandes
On August 24, 2016, petitioner submitted a request to return the children to the United States Department of State pursuant to the Hague Convention. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Kollective is a Korean company that had exclusive rights to some Korean pop music recordings in the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:08 am
McGuire, etc., et al., United States Circuit Court of Appeals, 3d Cir., April 1, 2008 [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:40 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 1605(a)(2), a tort claim for personal injuries suffered in connection with travel outside of the United States is “based upon” the allegedly tortious conduct occurring outside of the United States or the preceding sale of the ticket in the United States for the travel entirely outside the United States. [read post]