Search for: "Harder v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 3,475
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2022, 2:29 am by Florian Mueller
Match Group has been named as a defendant in litigation relating to its billing and subscription practices filed by multiple California District Attorneys relating to such practices, People of State of California v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Daphne Keller, Max Levy
Its substantive points are relevant to EU regulators and U.S. state lawmakers currently considering transparency legislation, in addition to members of Congress. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Will Baude
Justice Thomas of course questioned this power in Gonzales v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:24 am by ACLU
But across half the states, 36 million people are in danger of losing that right after the Supreme Court’s shameful decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:55 am by Michael C. Dorf
He writes: Suppose that in 1924 this Court had expressly reaffirmed Plessy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am by Guest Author
” The harder question is what happens once a court establishes that the agency’s interpretation involves a major question. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 12:41 pm
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 6:39 am
We've known all along that this law was there, and the threat to Roe has existed for 50 years, so the legislature could have repealed it.Should the state courts do what the legislature has not? [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am by Frank Cranmer
He stated: “In my judgment, the question as to whether a faculty should be granted to remove the organ must be considered on its own merits and it cannot be the case that its disposal is simply a necessary consequence of the construction of a new fire exit. [read post]