Search for: "He, et al v. Holder" Results 361 - 380 of 412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
”   This matter involved the regulatory authority of the Board and the County, not any relief against individual water rights holders. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm by FDABlog HPM
Kappos et al., Case No. 2010-1534, perhaps starting (or ending) another chapter in the saga over a Patent Term Extension (“PTE”) for U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
He’s spent plenty of time being skeptical about the state, trying to find self-organizing approaches like free software. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:18 am by Dennis Crouch
Feldman et al. count patent monetizers corresponding to CKS categories 2 through 5, and 7. [read post]
Ball et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-119 (Nov. 3, 2017) refused to dismiss claims against two former employees for breach of their restrictive covenants finding the Illinois Supreme Court would most likely reject the arbitrary two year bright-line rule in favor a fact-specific, totality-of-the-circumstances approach to the question of whether there was adequate consideration for the restrictive covenant agreement. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:21 am by Lyle Denniston
The Court’s ruling on taxes and medical residents came in the case of Mayo Foundation, et al., v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm by Dan Markel
”[v] Moreover, and “absent acceptable resolution, disputes would fester … [and] likely threaten the very survival of the community. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:40 am by Chris Castle
Supreme Court where he appeared or wrote important amicus briefs include Branzburg v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  No real study about trade dress compared to Tom Lee et al. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am by Robert Liles
In 2012, Attorney General Holder issued a statement (Holder Memo) outlining the DOJ’s policy on coordinating parallel civil and criminal proceedings to enforce against fraud. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]