Search for: "He v. Holder" Results 361 - 380 of 5,721
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2022, 9:56 am by Michael Oykhman
This was established in the British Colombia Supreme Court in a case known as R v Strong (see R v Strong, 2012 BCCA 279 (CanLII)). [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:38 am by Saraphin Dhanani
The Department concluded that “[t]he Donbass People’s Militia is an armed pro-Russian separatist group of rebels fighting Government of Ukraine forces in eastern Ukraine and threatening the stability and security of Ukraine in the Donetsk region. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 6:09 am by John Coyle
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by Dennis Crouch
Warhol’s key legal precedent on point is Campbell v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am by CMS
  Specified office holders are the Lord Advocate, Advocate General or the Attorney General. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am by Robert Liles
In 2012, Attorney General Holder issued a statement (Holder Memo) outlining the DOJ’s policy on coordinating parallel civil and criminal proceedings to enforce against fraud. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:15 am by Eric Goldman
Copyright holders have long ignored these potential infringements for a range of economic and public relations reasons. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:00 am by Florian Mueller
Arguably, a non-SEP holder can even argue that its position should be stronger as there is no FRAND licensing obligation under antitrust law (even non-SEPs can be subject to antitrust rules, but those cases are few and far between).Post-Sisvel v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:53 pm by Mark Walsh
There are frequent mentions of Kennedy’s concurring opinion in a relevant case, Rapanos v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm by Josh Blackman
And he wrote the principled decision in Seven-Sky v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
” Now leading precedent in Canadian Aboriginal law, the decision produced in Delgamuukw v British Columbia has been cited countless times in both the courts and the legal academy. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 4:45 am by Florian Mueller
This morning, the Munich I Regional Court held a first hearing (a prelude to a trial that has been scheduled for April 19, 2023) in the first Ericsson v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:00 am by Hayleigh Bosher
He fails to note that the legislative change he thinks would be necessary already occurred in the EU with the introduction of Directive 2004/48/EC while in U.S. patent law it has been accepted since the 2006 decision in eBay v. [read post]