Search for: "Heard v. State" Results 361 - 380 of 18,873
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2024, 11:32 am by David Klein
Everglades College, a Florida State court heard a constitutional challenge to the amended FTSA. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:36 am by Eric Goldman
Ark. 2019) (stating that “[t]he fact that the [confidentiality] Agreement does not state a time limitation, but instead applies forever, further supports a finding that it is unenforceable”); Howard Schultz & Assocs. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Thomas Merrill (Columbia), whom readers might remember as a guest-blogger from a couple of years ago, and who is the author of The Chevron Doctrine: Its Rise, and Fall, and the Future of the Administrative State (2022): Last week, the Supreme Court heard nearly four hours of argument about the Chevron doctrine—including whether it should be cast aside. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am by CMS
The case was heard by the Supreme Court on 25 and 26 April 2023 and judgment was handed down on 21 November 2023. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Dyson v Channel 4, heard 15 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Amersi v BBC, heard 8 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Shafi v New Vision TV Limited and another, heard 4 December 2023 (Johnson J) Wilson v Mendelsohn [read post]
The bench, comprising of Justices B V Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, did not find any merit in the applications. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm by Norman L. Eisen
We have not yet heard that much of Willis’s side of the story. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
As has been widely noted, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments yesterday in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 6:38 am by Unknown
Justices explored whether Item 303 omissions require a misleading statement and if private rights of action are authorized in this context (Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:54 am
By this time the case was called Chevron v. [read post]