Search for: "Held v. Secretary of Health and Human Services" Results 361 - 380 of 440
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
injury that the occurrences causing the injury arose out of activity incident to military service. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission reduced the classification to "other than serious" under 29 U.S.C. 666, in part because the Secretary failed to present case-specific evidence of possible employee exposure to asbestos. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:02 am by Martin Downs
Unfortunately that left out of account all the case law which reminds Tribunals not to substitute its view for that of the employer London Ambulance Service v Small [2009] EWCA Civ 220. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
(2) When federal food safety and humane handling regulations specify that animals (here, swine) which are or become nonambulatory on federally inspected premises are to be separated and held for observation and further disease inspection, did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that a state criminal law which requires that such animals not be held for observation and disease inspection, but instead be immediately euthanized, was not preempted by the FMIA? [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:30 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
As you may recall, MAO's were granted all the powers of the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the right to bring suit for MSP recoveries lies only with the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:08 pm by Steve Vladeck
  The implicit answer the brief gives is fairly typical for implied cause-of-action cases, i.e., that federal enforcement actions are theoretically available, and that private enforcement would produce potentially inconsistent judicial interpretations of the equal access provision that could interfere with the Secretary of Health and Human Services' authority to administer the Medicaid Act. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Because after all, there has to be a limit on how much we allow monetary calculations to trump our own humanity. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 1:35 pm by WIMS
This 20 per cent increase has had a hugely detrimental impact on human health and on economic productivity: people are sick and unable to work. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:10 am
We suggest that under circumstances in which the need to resolve the repayment obligation outweighs the costs an insurer/defendant may consider bringing an interpleader in which CMS is named as a defendant via the Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
The majority points to the role of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) in prompting the development of improved vaccine design and post-approval monitoring by various federal agencies. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm by Editor
Jay also founded Prefix, LLC, which helps lawyers and clients value and price legal services. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm by Editor
Jay also founded Prefix, LLC, which helps lawyers and clients value and price legal services. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:45 am by Russell Jackson
  It directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to promote "the development of childhood vaccines that result in fewer and less serious adverse reactions. . . . [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
British Pregnancy Advisory Service v Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWHC 235 (Admin) - read judgment The High Court has ruled that the law requiring that administration of the early medical abortion drugs take place at hospital cannot be read down to allow self-administration at home. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am by The Legal Blog
Such efforts have been undertaken in the recognition that ordinary market place for legal services fails to provide such services to significant segments of the population and to significant interests. [read post]