Search for: "Hoffmann v. Hoffmann"
Results 361 - 380
of 463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2010, 4:08 am
It sought to terminate Hoffmann on the bases on allegations that he had "engaged in inappropriate conduct and conduct unbecoming his profession. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:59 pm
Part V. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Since Begum, there has been Tsfayo v United Kingdom 48 EHRR 18. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Since Begum, there has been Tsfayo v United Kingdom 48 EHRR 18. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 7:38 am
” The case is McCarrell v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:45 am
Hoffmann La Roche Inc., 2010 WL 363834 (N.J. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:28 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., 392 F.Supp.2d 907, 919 (S.D. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:36 am
As an aside, Lord Hoffmann (who was, until recently, the most senior IP judge in the UK) has come up with two reasons that could be used to at least explain these exclusions. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 2:00 am
(EPLAW) Thrombin JM - Pharma company avoids injunction by dropping competitive keyword ads: King v ZymoGenetics (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Vytorin (Ezetimibe, Simvastatin) - US: Schering files patent infringement complaint against Mylan following Para IV challenge (Patent Docs) Xeloda (Capecitabine) - US: Hoffmann-La Roche files patent infringement complaint against Roxane following Para IV challenge (Patent Docs) [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 1:58 am
Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., 580 F.3d 1340, 1370 (Fed. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:04 am
Following the IPKat's earlier post on the German Bundesgerichtshof decision on Lundbeck's escitalopram patent, the Kat's plea for an English translation of the German original has been kindly answered by German IP practice Hoffmann Eitle. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 3:39 am
: Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:59 pm
Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
Lords Hoffmann and Mance explicitly only agree with Lord Scott; and Lord Mance unhelpfully on this point agrees with both Lords Scott and Walker. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:13 am
Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc. v. [read post]
