Search for: "Holder v. United States of America"
Results 361 - 380
of 619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2013, 12:30 pm
Gordon immigrated from Jamaica to the United States as a green card holder in 1982 when he was six years old, and he's lived here ever since. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 3:18 am
The state of affairs in the first Apple v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:19 am
Holder. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court, in its 5-4 decision today in Shelby v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Various legal changes from the 1980s onwards in the United States have been identified as responsible for making the American legal climate friendlier to patent holders, which in turn has spurred more applications. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:38 am
” Ah, but no less considerable a legal authority than the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has determined that, more likely than not, Aereo is not doing anything illegal. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:33 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:42 am
Toys "R" Us, Inc., has interpreted the first sale doctrine to cover both (1) copies manufactured aboard but first sold in the United States and (2) copies manufactured abroad but first sold in the United States with the American copyright owner's permission. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:02 pm
A word search shows this is only the fifth time a Supreme Court opinion has mentioned the WTO, along with Crosby v NFTC (2000), JEM Ag Supply v Pioneer Hi-Bred (2001), United Haulers v Oneida-Herkimer (2007), and Golan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:55 am
Before yesterday’s ruling in the Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm
Today is the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 12:55 am
Motorola ruling is highly influential, Judge James Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington -- with support from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit -- has become the pioneer and thought leader in the U.S. with respect to the adjudication of FRAND licensing terms by federal courts through the substantive and procedural decisions has has already made in the Microsoft v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:33 am
In United States v. [read post]
