Search for: "House v. Close" Results 361 - 380 of 7,434
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2010, 8:47 am by David Kopel
South Carolina. 5th District, House Budget Chairman John Spratt. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm by Giles Peaker
May I refer you to Birmingham City Council (Appellants) v Ali (FC) and others (FC) (Respondents) (2009) UKHL 36″. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 12:15 am
In my FindLaw column today, I describe the Supreme Court's treatment of the petitioner in Bowles v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 7:48 am by David Kravets
The high court in January asked for the government's views on the closely watched case. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:46 am by ANDREW BODNAR, MATRIX
Students of the law of criminal confiscation will be aware that in the late 1990s and over the turn of the Millennium the issue of postponing confiscation proceedings generated substantial litigation, leading to apparently contradictory judgments, culminating in the decisions of the House of Lords in R v Soneji ([2005] UKHL 49) and R v Knights ([2005] UKHL 50). [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:08 am
The Supreme Court has published its decision in the case of AXA General Insurance Limited and others v The Lord Advocate and Others [2011] UKSC 46 in which AXA and other insurers (the Insurers) appealed against the decision of the Inner House of the Court of Session regarding the legality of the Damages (Asbestos-Related Conditions) (Scotland) Act 2009 (the 2009 Act) (please see our previous blog here for further information on that decision).The 2009 Act was passed to reverse the… [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am by Aaron Rubin and Heather Whitney
Florida appealed the court’s ruling and we will be watching closely to see how the Eleventh Circuit rules in the appeal (Plaintiff’s response was submitted on November 8). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am by JB
OPM and the unconstitutional conditions argument in Mass v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 2:47 pm by David Smith
In Spencer Lewison engaged in a close reading of s21(1) and 21(2), Housing Act 1988. [read post]
A closely-divided California Supreme Court has dealt employment arbitrations a potentially huge setback. [read post]