Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 361 - 380
of 550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2016, 11:04 am
Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg criticizes her proposal (again, tongue in cheek). [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:46 am
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s analysis of Wednesday’s oral argument in McDonough v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 8:34 am
[UPDATE: Views offered by several commenters below, including Howard Wasserman and Michael Risch, persuade me that this could be hearsay. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:01 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman expresses doubt that the statute will pass constitutional muster, but in a second post he offers a reluctant defense of the revised statute. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman discusses the Court’s summary opinion in James v. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 7:47 am
Howard Dean on to discuss it. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:58 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman discusses standing and a question left open by Monday’s decision in Susan B. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman assesses “who within or around the Court comes out ahead and who behind in” the Garland nomination “debacle”; in the first category he points to Justice Elena Kagan, who “might have been the intellectual center of a liberal Court,” and he includes Chief Justice John Roberts, who “avoids the prospect of being a Chief regularly in the minority and assigning dissents rather than majority… [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:11 am
Luke Rioux discusses the decision in detail at Harmless Error, while Howard Wasserman weighs in at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:20 am
Muchnick, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg praises the opinion for getting a jurisdictional issue “just right and in a straight-forward way, with a minimum of complications or confusion. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 9:45 pm
” Howard Wasserman suggests that, because the Court hears so few cases, it should do a better job of selecting cases that provide a vehicle for rulemaking to guide the lower Courts. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:23 am
Tim Epstein addressed the tort implications of cheerleading in his 2006 post, From Poms to Pain, and more recently Tim, Marc Edelman, and Howard Wasserman have all considered Wisconsin courts' handling of cheerleading as a contact sport and the impact on Title IX, particularly in the Noffke v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 7:26 am
One doesn't become an accomplice to a crime because some nutjob in the audience, boiling over with rage and righteous indignation, decides to make a left turn toward harming the other candidate instead of a right turn into the voting booth.At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman confronts the ugly lawyer tendency to frame issues in terms of law, distinguishing ugly rhetoric from criminal conduct. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:00 am
Howard Wasserman of PrawfsBlawg notes those posts and others. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:40 am
’” In another post at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman responds to Garnett’s post, acknowledging that “[i]t is an open question when, exactly, an establishment occurs (which is Rick’s point),” but adding that “it is not as simple as Kennedy suggests in saying ‘you can always express your own views’–the government’s involvement changes the metric. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:19 am
At PrawfsBlog, Howard Wasserman also explores possible congressional or state actions that could simultaneously allow willing shareholders to opt in to election-related activities while limiting the broader role of corporate expenditures. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 4:12 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman discusses last week’s oral argument in Ziglar v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:36 am
And at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman predicts that “Kagan being ‘conflicted’ about this will not move the needle at all, [because] . . . the collegiality norms on the Court mean that, as long as one Justice remains strongly opposed to cameras, the rest of the Justices are never going to push the issue. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 6:06 am
I'll be there later this afternoon to present a 7 minute version of my paper with Howard Wasserman and Michael McCann called, Catalyzing Fans. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:54 am
” And at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman discusses Scalia’s remarks in an unrecorded speech at Princeton – in which, according to a Princeton faculty member who opposes same-sex marriage, Scalia “declared that though Supreme Court rulings should generally be obeyed, officials had no Constitutional obligation to treat as binding beyond the parties to a case rulings that lack a warrant in the text or original understanding of the Constitution. [read post]
