Search for: "Howard v. Place"
Results 361 - 380
of 850
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
Accordingly, the applicant will normally be required to pay the lessor's costs of the forfeiture proceedings, save in so far as those costs have been increased by the lessor's opposition to the grant of relief, upon appropriate terms - see Howard v Fanshawe [1895] 2 Ch 581, 592, and Abbey National Building Society v Maybeech Ltd and another [1985] Ch 190, 206. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am
”’” For Capitol Media Services (via Payson Roundup), Howard Fischer reports that after Monday’s cert denial in Brewer v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s argument analysis. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
Accordingly, the applicant will normally be required to pay the lessor's costs of the forfeiture proceedings, save in so far as those costs have been increased by the lessor's opposition to the grant of relief, upon appropriate terms - see Howard v Fanshawe [1895] 2 Ch 581, 592, and Abbey National Building Society v Maybeech Ltd and another [1985] Ch 190, 206. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:14 am
The case (Plowman v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 6:31 am
Readers who saw the Ron Howard movie Apollo 13 will remember this - it's the "abort" handle Tom Hanks was looking at just after launch - if anything had gone wrong he would have pulled it - when the need for it passed the commander hits the "tower jettison" switch and the tower takes off with the boost protective cover attached, leaving the command module in place as the Saturn V heads towards orbit. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:24 pm
Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003); Grutter v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 2:09 pm
Howard M. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
In Meade v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am
This is particularly important because the advertising is presented to a consumer at a time when the consumer is more likely to be looking to buy…. the restrictions at issue here are not limitations on the content of an advertisement a consumer would otherwise see; they are restrictions on a consumer’s opportunity to see a competitor’s ad in the first place. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:48 am
U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 8:35 am
Aside from the powerful precedent set in Hudson v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:02 am
Allwright, Shelley v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm
Cain, eds. 2006) The Supreme Court and Election Law: A Reply to Three Commentators, 31 Journal of Legislation 1 (2004) Looking for Standards (in all the Wrong Places): Partisan Gerrymandering Claims After Vieth, 3 Election Law Journal 626 (2004) (draft available) The California Recall Punch Card Litigation: Why Bush v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
” (Hat tip: Howard Bashman.) [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
McLeod v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
But then Howard went on to state, "This case, for whatever reason, has not been worked up in a reasonable fashion. . . . [read post]
