Search for: "Howes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections"
Results 361 - 380
of 526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Georgia and McClesky v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
IPSO Resolution Statement – 21032-23 Collins v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 16764-23 Loftus, Brame, Shearly-Sanders & McLeod v hadleigh.nub.news, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction Statements in open court and apologies We are not aware of any statements in open court or apologies in the last two weeks. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
Under a theory derived from Marbury v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
Response #5: Other Treasury Department rolls from the Early Republic did not address the Sinecure Clause Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton and this staff prepared more than a few lists during Hamilton's tenure. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 10:10 am
In its 1983 decision in the matter of INS v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
Baroness Barran, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Education replied: “My Lords, the UK is a proud signatory of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:15 am
District Court for the District of Columbia finally provided some guidance on this issue in UPMC Braddock v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm
Cecilia Marshall (July 20, 1928 – Nov. 22, 2022) In 1948, Cecilia “Cissy” Suyat took a job as a legal secretary at the NAACP in New York City. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
This is not how civil litigation works,” the court reminded (Doe 2 v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
The Biden v. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 6:52 am
See Backpage.com v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am
On November 3, 1790, the Virginia House of Delegates adopted a resolution condemning Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton’s Funding Act of 1790. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Nonetheless, all of this evidence seems both relevant and probative of how this term was actually understood and used by the founding generation. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 2:35 pm
The results of the Presidential and Congressional elections in 2024 could also affect how and whether these new provisions get fully implemented. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
By contrast, Bittner maintained that the “violation” was failure to file the report, regardless of how many bank accounts were on it. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:28 pm
The offenders will be able to cite a New Zealand Court of Appeal decision, Belcher v Department of Corrections [2006] NZCA 262, that ruled that a very similar scheme was a penalty/punishment for the purposes of the NZBoRA. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
This is obviously correct. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:01 am
The central part of the 117-page opinion, captioned Texas v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 8:55 pm
Circuit issued its long-awaited ruling in Friedman v. [read post]
