Search for: "IN RE GRANT"
Results 361 - 380
of 37,499
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
In re Am. [read post]
6 May 2008, 8:38 am
This Thursday, the Federal Circuit will hear oral arguments en banc in In re Bilski (No. 2007-1130), a case that will help define the scope of patentable subject matter. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 10:28 pm
The Supreme Court has just granted cert in the case of Republic of the Philippines v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 8:06 pm
TEXAS SUPREME COURT GRANTS EMPLOYER'S PETITION FOR MANDAMUS TO REQUIRE EMPLOYEE TO ARBITRATE HER WRONGFUL TERMINATION CLAIM In Re Polymerica, L.L.C., (Tex. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
In re Application of The Bank of New York Mellon, No. 651786/11, slip op. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 6:02 am
The Court granted cert in Heffernon v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:00 am
Two weeks ago, when I reported on the Supreme Court's grant of review in In re Tobacco II and Pfizer, I pointed out that the two Court of Appeal opinions were "no longer citable as precedent. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:25 am
In an order, dated June 11, 2018, the court granted the motion without opposition and ordered an immediate trial on damages. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 12:22 pm
“Chief Justice Roberts warns we’re taking ‘democracy for granted. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 7:52 am
"In my view, [In re Cray Inc., 871 F.3d 1355 (Fed. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 5:38 pm
All the while, we pretend that the Governor's decision is "neutral" even though we all know full well that we're really just engaging in Kabuki theatre.But whatever. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 8:44 am
Because Koss management could have (and should have) done exactly what they’re saying Grant Thornton should have done. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:30 pm
If they don't tell the guy how they're gonna kill him, then he can't really complain that they'll do it unconstitutionally. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 1:31 pm
., No. 1-08-1950 (9-30-09) reversed a decision that found that the docket entry, which was inconsistent with the written order, stated plaintiffs were granted leave to refile, and thus the docket entry is express reservation of plaintiffs' right to refile and their suit not being res judicata. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 5:08 pm
By Jason Rantanen In re Acer America Corporation (Fed. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am
The Court granted cert. limited to the first question presented in Kawashima v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 9:58 am
See In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Tires Prods. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
Despite having granted the injunction, the court viewed the likelihood of a higher bid as slight. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 3:54 pm
(In re Milton (2019) 42 Cal.App.5th 977, 982)So there's (1) a split in the panel opinion, (2) and a split in the various Court of Appeal holdings, (3) on an issue that's present in a boatload of cases.There's exactly a zero chance that the California Supreme Court doesn't grant review. [read post]
30 May 2023, 1:57 pm
And I doubt that the California Supreme Court will decide to grant review.So this 73-year old woman is likely to, in fact, get out of prison relatively soon. [read post]
