Search for: "IN RE RULES FOR MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION"
Results 361 - 380
of 387
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
Of the 77 letters that addressed the appropriate length for a required continuous holding period, 75 percent recommended two years, 21 percent recommended one year and 4 percent recommended three years. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
’ Court of Appeal rules... [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Inventive Step) Copyrighting a prior public disclosure: In re Lister (IP Directions) (IP Osgoode) A closer look at requests to stay section 337 investigations pending re-examination at the USPTO (ITC 337 Law Blog) Patent prosecution tips: drafting preambles (Patently-O) US Patents - Decisions CAFC: When are subsidiaries covered in a license agreement? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
’ Court of Appeal rules... [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Legal Authority II. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
[Plaintiff] can hardly avoid violating this Kafkaesque rule. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
TCCLES, therefore, seeks opportunities to dialog about these beliefs and the evidence behind them with the bar associations and CLE providers of Tennessee and to work with the associations and providers to discover how the Rule for Mandatory Continuing Legal Education and the Commission's Regulations can best enable and encourage high quality mentoring.Hat tip: J. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
To use a credit card please go to the BookLocker at:http://www.booklocker.com/books/3916.html[]===========General Index of Topics Ability to perform light duty - discontinuation of GML §207-c benefitsAdministrative proceduresAge discriminationAgreement to retire.Allowing the arbitrator to exceed authorityApplicants for §207-c benefits -a "direct causal relationshipApplication for an accident disability retirement - tie vote by review boardApplications for accidental… [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 7:08 am
Ultimately, a reasonable degree of uniformity will lead to increased compliance by offenders and fewer legal defenses for those who continue to be non-compliant. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:52 pm
Also, you may or may not be re-read your Miranda rights. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine ranges far beyond the opinion to explore the legal and business context in which then-Delaware Supreme Court Chief Justice Andrew G.T. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom battle:… [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 4:15 am
Authorities ruled it a suicide.Court papers show the alarming trend prompted the U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
Despite the Supreme Court's 1976 ruling in Gregg v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:33 pm
Also, you may or may not be re-read your Miranda rights. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Bonner, No. 06-3350 Sentences for wire fraud, theft of government funds and theft of educational funds are affirmed where restitution under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act is not a criminal punishment and does not need to be proven to a jury, and the district court properly relied on intended loss in calculating one defendant's advisory guidelines range. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 9:09 pm
I will reform sentencing rules to address punishment disparities for crimes involving crack and powder cocaine and review mandatory minimum sentences for first-time, nonviolent offenses. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 6:19 am
This rule applies even if no claim for workers’ compensation benefits has been filed. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:42 pm
Last time I checked, their job was to enforce professional standards (which is different from enforcing cartels), and to encourage the profession, in general, to aspirational goals such as more pro bono work, defense of the indigent and representation of the impoverished, participation in public service, continuing legal education, and, most broadly, promoting the rule of law. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 5:23 pm
(Click here for a snapshot of the key legal drivers behind mandatory compliance training.) [read post]
