Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF R. P., A CHILD" Results 361 - 380 of 837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2013, 10:59 am by Veronika Gaertner
  Christoph Thole: Verbrauchergerichtsstand aufgrund schlüssiger Behauptung für eine Kapitalanlegerklage gegen die Hausbank des Anlagefonds? [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
 In In re Mark C., supra, 244 Cal.App.4th 520, Division Two followed its earlier decision in In re Erica R., supra, 240 Cal.App.4th 907&n [read post]
29 May 2010, 9:57 am
Comparing calendar year ages would allow a nearly five-year age difference in some cases, which was not the intent, Judge Daniel P. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 9:54 pm
The court adopted the definition that feasibility in this context means: the child plaintiff has the burden of showing that joinder was "impossible, impractical or not in the child's best interest for his or her claim to be joined with those of the injured parent. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:20 am
Certainly it is a decision regarding the child's best interest, to which the court must {Slip Opn. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 11:14 am
Elérí Ípin, Ìbikeji Olódumarè, A-je-jù-Oògùn, Obìriti, A-p'ijó-ikú-da, Olúwa mi, A-to-i-ba-j'ayé, Òrò à-bi-kú-j'igbo, Olúwa mi, Ajiki, Ógégé a-gb'ayé-gún; Odúdú ti nídú orí emèrè; A-tún-orí-tí-kò… [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
P v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, heard 3-4 May 2017. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It should be noted that two interests at stake — the needs of the child and the needs of the community — are presumptively entitled to equal weight akin to the rulings in Matter of Todd B., Matter of Timothy C., Matter of Pedro A., Matter of Aaron P. and Matter of Horan A. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 2:36 pm
App. 749, 145 P.3d 1247 (2006), the court held that expired CBAs are not enforceable. [read post]
13 May 2017, 12:30 pm by Marta Requejo
Based on the principle that a child’s parenthood cannot be subject to private autonomy, in cases where we are only faced with facts (reproductive practice) and private acts (surrogacy arrangements) the child’s parenthood will not be established yet (conflict of Laws method), in order to serve her best interest. [read post]