Search for: "In Interest of Jackson"
Results 361 - 380
of 5,896
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 4:24 am
No, responded Sotomayor, who was joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
But it doesn’t necessarily make the diversity interest a sham or valueless. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:43 pm
Student loan relief packages can also come through state legislation, including forcing loaners to massively reduce their interest rates. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 3:15 pm
But if not "educational benefits," then what compelling interest would suffice? [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 7:20 am
It's interesting to see "decadent racial-preference game" in The New Yorker. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:09 pm
If we take conflicts of interest seriously, a Justice's deeply-held views on affirmative action should favor recusal far more than service on a board that had some tangential connection to the university's affirmative action policies. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am
This opinion also does not address the issue, in light of the potentially distinct interests that military academies may present. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am
(Justice Jackson's similar historical review made no such omission.) [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:19 am
But most cases fail under the compelling interest test. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 5:10 am
Still, polling about such decisions can be interesting. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:48 pm
Lengthy concurring and dissenting opinions were issued as well: Justice Thomas, Justice Gorsuch (with Justice Thomas joining), and Justice Kavanaugh each wrote concurrences; Justice Sotomayor wrote a dissent that Justices Kagan and Jackson joined (although Justice Jackson only joined with respect to the UNC case, having recused herself from the Harvard case); and Justice Jackson wrote a dissent with respect to the UNC case that Justices Sotomayor and Kagan joined. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:24 am
But in her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor – in an opinion joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson – called the decision “a sad day in the American constitutional law and in the lives of LGBTQ people. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:53 am
The first prong asks whether the state asserts a compelling interest. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
Justice Elena Kagan dissented, in an opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
[including when the requirement is imposed by antidiscrimination laws, for instance when such laws require web site designers who create opposite-sex wedding sites create same-sex wedding sites.] [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
Yet even they (wielding their “special niche” authority) cannot simply assert an interest in diversity and discriminate as they please. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Thankfully, Justice Jackson in particular did highlight some of those benefits. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm
The crudeness of the racial and ethnic categories used by Harvard and UNC also undercut Justice Jackson's otherwise powerful appeal to the historic disadvantages faced by African-Americans. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:55 pm
Justice Jackson dissent was related to the North Carolina case. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
In 25 years, she suggested, “the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest” in diversity. [read post]
